.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Friday, March 22, 2013

Police searching your cell phone without a warrant




California ACLU files a lawsuit on the right of the police to search your cell phone and Internet messages without a warrant
  • The Bill of Rights is ignored by both parties in the rush to create a police state.
  • Democrat Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed legislation requiring a search warrant of your phone and Internet messages.
  • A bill requiring a search warrant failed to pass the GOP controlled US House of Representatives.


Police State  -  The results of a lawsuit filed Wednesday by the ACLU of Northern California will tell whether police have the right to search a suspect’s phone for incriminating evidence. The suit follows an activist's arrest while he pitched a tent at a protest.

According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), following Bob Offer-Westort’s arrest one of the two officers in question began to scroll through the detainee’s text messages and read them aloud.

The plaintiff, a longtime activist in the area, was concerned that some of the personal content of these texts would damage his existing relationships with local officials reports RT News - USA.

This latest lawsuit highlights the ongoing dispute between privacy advocates and law enforcement officials.The California Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that warrantless searches of mobile phones did not violate the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.

People's Republic of California Governor Jerry Brown, in turn, cited that precedent when he vetoed legislation which would have required police to obtain a warrant before searching through the mobile phones of suspects.

In the case of Offer-Westort, police began to read through his texts prior to formal booking, and allegedly did so for weeks until the phone was returned to him months after the arrest.

The ACLU aims to use this latest lawsuit to demonstrate that such seizure and search violates California’s constitution.

Marley Degner, an attorney whose firm is providing pro bono services in the case, believes that cellphones are now “virtually home offices that contain personal, professional and financial information about their owners and others.”

As such, the suit will seek to make the case that warrantless searches of cell phones not only violate the rights of those arrested, but also those of family, friends, co-workers and anyone else whose information may be held by the device. No hearing date has been set thus far for this case.

On the federal level, lawmakers from both parties have attempted to introduce reforms to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 to ensure law enforcement obtain warrants before searching electronic communications or location data.

Late last year, representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Ted Poe (R-Texas) and Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) introduced legislation that would have amended ECPA with greater privacy guarantees, though the bill failed to advance to the Senate.


Warrantless Searching Of Cell Phones Allowed For California Police




Judge Napolitano
Cell Data Be Protected By the Fourth Amendment



Ruling supports cell phone searches
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court now says police don't need a search warrant to look through phone records.







1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I now have concerns that the COVID-19 tracing program will turn cell phones into tracking devices, essentially tethers, for people who have been identified as having been in contact with someone who has COVID-19 symptoms.